Honors Conference Evaluation Form

Honors Liaison: Please complete the following checklist, based on the Candidate's presentation and the Faculty Advisor's comments at the Honors Conference.

Each NO response must be explained in the space at the bottom of this form. Feel free to also add comments and concerns about any YES answers.

If this is the candidate's second term in Honors, you must also complete the Oral Examination Panel Nominations Form.

Return to the Chair of the Honors Committee.

---

Candidate Name:		Date:
Faculty Advisor:
Honors Liaison:

	YES	NO	Item
1.			Candidate has established and is following an effective research and writing schedule.
2.			Candidate has acquired and is using necessary materials (e.g., library resources or laboratory equipment).
3.			Candidate is addressing problems that have occurred or are foreseen.
4.			Candidate presented a printed bibliography of works relevant to the project on which he/she marked with an (a) works already read and with a (b) others that will have to be read before the project is completed
5.			Faculty Advisor is satisfied with Candidate's progress and prospects for successfully completing the project.
6.			Honors Committee Liaison is satisfied with Candidate's progress and prospects for successfully completing the project.
7.			The Oral Examination Panel Nominations Form is attached. If this checklist has been completed after your second Honors Conference with the Candidate and Faculty Advisor, and if you checked "NO," briefly explain why the form has not been included. If you checked "Yes" but have concerns about the nominations, state them in the space below.

---

All NO responses must be explained in the space below. Use additional sheets if necessary.